Professional Skepticism
Professional Skepticism
An attitude that includes a questioning mind, being alert to conditions which may indicate possible misstatement, and a critical assessment of audit evidence.Professional skepticism includes being alert to, for example:
·
Audit evidence that contradicts other audit
evidence obtained.
·
Information that brings into question the
reliability of documents and responses to inquiries.
·
Conditions that may indicate possible fraud.
·
Circumstances that suggest the need for
additional audit procedures.
Professional Judgement
Professional Judgement
The application of relevant training, knowledge and experience (within the context provided by auditing, accounting and ethical standard) in making informed decisions about the courses of action that are appropriate in the circumstances of the audit engagement.Professional judgement is essential to the proper conduct of an audit. Professional judgement is necessary in particular regarding decisions about:
·
Materiality and audit risk.
·
The nature, timing and extent of audit
procedures.
·
Evaluating whether sufficient appropriate
audit evidence has been obtained.
·
The evaluation of management’s judgements in
applying the entity’s applicable financial reporting framework.
·
The drawing of conclusions based on the audit
evidence obtained.
Professional Skepticism and Professional Judgement is applied throughout the audit i.e. Planning Stage, During the Audit and Conclusion Stage. |
Applicable Financial
Reporting Framework
Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
The financial reporting framework adopted by management in the preparation of the financial statements that is acceptable in view of the nature of the entity and the objective of the financial statements, or that is required by law or regulation
Acceptable Financial Reporting Framework
Post a Comment